Auto accidents

Can I Sue For Medical Malpractice If My Operation Did Not Get The Results I Was Hoping For?

By October 4, 2017 November 14th, 2018 No Comments

Suing will depend on whether the level of care received should have been expected in the given circumstances or not. 

Meaning of Medical Malpractice 
Medical malpractice is regarded as the unskilled, improper and negligent care performed by a certified medical professional such as a nurse, dentist, doctor or any other health care expert that harms the patient. Medical malpractice lawsuits are filed when a healthcare expert departs from undertaking the normal standard of care and such departure causes wrongful death or injury of the patient.
Notably, the meaning of medical malpractice is not universal, as some elements may differ across various jurisdictions in the United States. Commonly, medical malpractice necessitates experts to show testimony and evidence. The bottom line of the lawsuit is that a medical professional caused injuries to the patient in the course of his or her duties owing to substandard services. To this end, you may sue anyone in the chain of treatment that was responsible for your woes. 

The most common defendants in a medical malpractice action are doctors, nurses, hospitals and other professionals. Doctors are frequently involved in medical malpractice cases as they gave you direct care. Hospitals are sued because they recruited the employees who injured you. In addition, they may have controlled the circumstances leading to the medical malpractice. Nurses are professionals and as such, they can be held liable for medical malpractices. Anesthetics, radiologists and other medical professionals may be enjoined in a medical malpractice lawsuit if they directly provided you with care. 
Results may not be guaranteed. The fact that the procedure was not successful does not imply that there was any form of negligence. The ground to pursuing a medical malpractice case is anchored on the harm caused due to defendant’s negligence during the operation. It is for this reason that you are required to be accompanied by a medical expert who will testify about the harm. This professional should be able to exhibit how the misconduct of the defendant resulted to your injuries. In addition, you will have to demonstrate how the injury caused damages, including mental, physical and financial or any other losses. 

Definition of Negligence in Medical Malpractice Cases
For purposes of medical malpractice cases, a patient must identify the negligence caused by the professional and indicate how such laxity caused the injury. In this regard, negligence entails that the experts’ omissions or actions were unreasonable during the operation. This means that in the absence of negligence, a rational being would have acted differently in such circumstances. However, it is intricate to determine whether or not a physician, surgeon or radiologist was negligent. In medical malpractice cases, negligence is universal. Nevertheless, it is arrived at differently.
Prevailing in a Medical Malpractice case

For the plaintiff to succeed in a medical malpractice case, he or she must prove four crucial elements: damages, proximate cause, a breach of duty and duty. If one of these elements is missing, the case may not prevail. 

In medical malpractice, duty entails that the healthcare expert should deliver services in line with the standard of care. The existence of doctor-patient relationship makes the doctor liable for his or her actions. The standard of care means that a doctor should possess the skills and knowledge that any rational and qualified physician would apply in similar circumstances. It is the duty of the plaintiff to hire an expert witness. This professional should prove that the defendant breached the standard of care. 
If the expert successfully proves the standard of care, the plaintiff should demonstrate that there was a foreseeable breach of duty, which involves an omission or an act. Proximate cause indicates that there should be a subsisting correlation between the plaintiff’s injuries and the alleged negligence. The causal connection should place the defendant at the center of the plaintiff’s woes because of his or her negligence. Proximate cause is a big defense, as it may be an uphill task for the plaintiff to prove. 
The onus is on the plaintiff to prove that he has sustained damage or injury. The damage may be economic or non-economic. The plaintiff may be compensated for disfigurement, past and present pain and suffering, medical care costs and lost earnings. 

Before filing for a medical malpractice lawsuit, it is advisable to make sure that the plaintiff has a serious or permanent injury considering that the cases are expensive and hard to prosecute. In addition, it is prudent to seek the services of an experienced medical malpractice attorney.

Leave a Reply